Avatar
Valuetree4

0 Following 0 Followers
1
AsoningTable 3. Frequencies (and proportions) of selections of each policy by frame.AsoningTable 3. Frequencies (and proportions) of selections of each policy by frame. Economy Beast (n = 423) Virus (n = 453) 2(1) 101 (.239) 81 (.179) 4.421 Education 92 (.217) 95 (.210) 0.039 Patrols 120 (.284) 107 (.236) 2.328 Prison 24 (.057) 27 (.060) 0.001 Watch 86 (.203) 143 (.316) 13.728*Note. Data are
1
Emphasized "patrols", 2(1) = 37.085, p < .001 ( = 1.269, SE = .217, p < .001), and "prison" sentences, 2(1) = 48.529, p < .001 ( = 1.562, SE = .241, pEmphasized "patrols", 2(1) = 37.085, p < .001 ( = 1.269, SE = .217, p < .001), and "prison" sentences, 2(1) = 48.529, p < .001 ( = 1.562, SE = .241, p < .001) to the beast frame.PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939 July 28,8 /Metaphorica
1
N they rated the severity, metaphoricity, and conventionality of the fourN they rated the severity, metaphoricity, and conventionality of the four frames (on 101-point scales): "Please rate these descriptions of crime in terms of how severe they make the issue seem, metaphorical the language is, common or conventional the language is." Finally, participants were asked to select "which of the
2
Participants in each of the two metaphor framing conditions. We estimatedParticipants in each of the two metaphor framing conditions. We estimated that as many as 25 of the participants that we sampled would have to be excluded because they had previously participated in a related study or because they would submit an incorrect completion code. As a result we collected data from 650 partici
2
Emphasized "patrols", 2(1) = 37.085, p < .001 ( = 1.269, SE = .217, p < .001), and "prison" sentences, 2(1) = 48.529, p < .001 ( = 1.562, SE = .241, pEmphasized "patrols", 2(1) = 37.085, p < .001 ( = 1.269, SE = .217, p < .001), and "prison" sentences, 2(1) = 48.529, p < .001 ( = 1.562, SE = .241, p < .001) to the beast frame.PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939 July 28,8 /Metaphorica
1
Option in earlier studies [5] or Experiment 2 of [6]. FigPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.Option in earlier studies [5] or Experiment 2 of [6]. FigPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939 July 28,7 /Metaphorical ReasoningFig 2. The proportion of policy responses that were matched to the beast and virus metaphors. Error bars reflect 95 confidence intervals. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133939.
1
A scale that ranged from 0, very reform oriented to 100, very enforcement-orientedA scale that ranged from 0, very reform oriented to 100, very enforcement-oriented). The other two response options?education" (M = 17.14, sd = 27.13) and "economy" (M = 20.82, sd = 30.93) ere, on the other hand, viewed as reform-oriented. However, we noted that the "neighborhood watch" "option was not rated as
1
N they rated the severity, metaphoricity, and conventionality of the fourN they rated the severity, metaphoricity, and conventionality of the four frames (on 101-point scales): "Please rate these descriptions of crime in terms of how severe they make the issue seem, metaphorical the language is, common or conventional the language is." Finally, participants were asked to select "which of the